(no subject)
Feb. 26th, 2008 11:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
d_aulnoySo, I've just discovered fark.com.
Yes, I know, I'm about a decade behind the curve.
Downside: (Un)surprisingly sexist!
Upside: Occasional headlines like, " French court rules Heineken's website illegal, tells them to go away or it will taunt them again"
Decisions, decisions.
Yes, I know, I'm about a decade behind the curve.
Downside: (Un)surprisingly sexist!
Upside: Occasional headlines like, " French court rules Heineken's website illegal, tells them to go away or it will taunt them again"
Decisions, decisions.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 01:14 pm (UTC)For a jubilant ANPAA, the ruling was the latest in a spate of victories. It recently won civil suits against a French newspaper editorial and also Moët & Chandon, for “glorifying Champagne”. ANPAA says it is protecting public health by challenging irresponsible marketing.
the French are condemning drinking champagne. this has to be some kind of sign of Armageddon.
Nicolas Sarkozy must be so pleased - bringing France closer to being the US!
(in other news, Quebec has released a statement: "France? What? No, we don't know those guys.")